Implications of the Richards Decision for Major League Soccer & Houston
Recite the last name of some of association football's legendary players and their achievements immediately spring to mind. Just mentioning Pelé, Maradona, Eusebio, Puskas, or other luminaries should arouse images--most likely fuzzy and pixelated ones from YouTube--of what made them great and become instantly vivid, incredibly tangible. There are others, however, whose names might be just as influential in the progression of the sport internationally and domestically but their principal accomplishments were made off the field. While this might make them less tangible when being measured against those who have become quick answers to sports bar quizzes owing to their status in the game's lore, their contributions could be considered just as notable.
Internationally, Belgian player Jean-Marc Bosman forever made his name the reference when discussing contemporary player transactions in Europe and brought about grander implications for foreign labor across European borders following the 1995 European Court of Justice ruling on his behalf. Domestically, David Beckham lent his name to the rule that allows Major League Soccer clubs to recruit higher priced players whilst keeping them within the league's salary cap structure. Granted, there is more attached to Beckham than the Designated Player Rule (beyond his attachment to a possible cyborg via marriage), but for the game's evolution here this could be his more lasting legacy. Going forward, MLS might need to readdress the parameters within which clubs are allowed to lay claim to and sign Homegrown Players, for reasons that pertain not only to the viability of future SuperDrafts but also to the relationships top division clubs like Houston have with the semi-pro and amateur league teams. Might we be soon referencing the importance of a Richards Rule, and how might that impact Dynamo?
On the face of it, Portland having signed Brent Richards as its first Homegrown Player ahead of this year's SuperDraft appeared slightly at odds with the rules. As addressed here the ability for Timbers to lay claim to him, thus removing the player from eligibility for 2012 draft consideration, looked to have violated rules currently in place. Following the trail of crumbs deeper into the forest here revealed the many-tentacled associations that permitted Richards to officially become a part of Portland's organization and suggests what transpired was most likely a one-off scenario owing to the Cascadia club's recent promotion as an MLS side. On the whole, we are advised the league evaluates claims to Homegrown Players on per case basis, and there are exceptions to the current rules occurring more often than are possibly recognized. Further, as Richards did not project to be a high pick in the upcoming draft, him being plucked now by Timbers amounts to little with regard to the remaining talent on offer.
So, much ado about nothing, right?
Perhaps, but one of the principal ties that bound Portland to Richards and made this deal sealed was the association with the Premier Development League. As Merritt Paulson admitted, Richards's tenure with the Portland Timbers PDL team alone did not guarantee acceptance by the league, but it certainly did no harm. The relationship appears more salient when compared with what United Soccer Leagues club Orlando City SC has been doing to catch Don Garber's eye when the league decides the location of its 20th franchise. To solidify their position as a promotion candidate, the Florida club purchased a PDL team of their own in Central Florida Kraze . On top of saving the team's fans from having to cheer for a side with a slightly silly, misspelled concept of a nickname by purchasing them and rebranding them as Orlando City U-23, Orlando City bought themselves a closer relationship with the Premier Development League on the road to becoming potentially MLS-worthy.
It seems strange a small club would purchase an interest in an even smaller club to bolster their MLS candidacy were they not aware that a future path to legitimacy and viability in the top division rested down this avenue. Further, it appears unlikely a club like Chicago--which has already established deep links to both the PDL and National Premier Soccer League--would only bristle at the Richards decision and not make more of a stink over rejected claims to several players they might have rights to in a similar fashion as Portland had in this matter. One might imagine that were Chicago to make a fresh claim for a Homegrown Player with organizational ties similar to the one Portland had with Richards, MLS could have a problem on its hands were that claim tossed out.
What this suggests, then, is that clubs with legitimate organizational ties to PDL or NPSL teams going forward might have greater leverage over securing the services of young talent in opposition to a SuperDraft. If MLS approves of Homegrown allocations such as in the Richards decision, based at least partially on the player's association with a PDL team, it would seem to behoove other clubs to follow the precedent now set by Portland and the one being cultivated by Orlando City SC--as well as Chicago well before either of them--to strengthen any tenuous bonds with the lower divisions by absorbing these teams and have them run parallel with the academies to argue their claims to player rights ownership more vociferously.
In relation to Houston, this off-season a personnel link was created between them and the reborn Austin Aztex of the Premier Development League. When Austin begins play this summer, they will be coached by Paul Dalglish, former Dynamo player and current head of the club's Central Texas Dynamo Juniors program. As Dalglish balances both tasks, identifying local players to develop for possible Academy recruitment as well as those to fill his Aztex squad, he will be well placed to assist Houston in discovering talent in the Texas capital and possibly serve as a primary link that finds the PDL side become an extension of Dynamo's recruitment schemes. Should there be gold found in them thar hills, might Houston place a bid for Austin Aztex to become a Dynamo U-23 team in order to have first right of refusal for any talent unearthed? If there is no further clarification on the Homegrown rule following the Brent Richards claim that narrows such a path in player development and ownership, this could be a future consideration for Chris Canetti & Co. to seriously ponder.
With their Homegrown claim, Portland was able to remove one player that looked likely to have been taken in SuperDraft 2012, in part due to his association with their PDL club. On the eve of the draft, Columbus look to taken another off the big board through their Academy relationship with Ben Speas, a potential Generation adidas talent. Should Major League Soccer wish to keep its draft somewhat relevant in the wake of these ever-evolving ways to lock up young talent, they might want to make a more uniform decision on what constitutes eligibility of acquisition via the Homegrown Player rule. Should they maintain the status quo and consider the merits of each claim by its own unique individual circumstances, the potential for further erosion of the SuperDraft's impact on a club's roster--not to mention an ominous signal to college soccer that talent will not remain within their ranks for any consistent period of time--exists. For Dynamo supporters, they might start having to look more intently at what the club does with strengthening their association in Austin and the Academy rather than scouting out potential picks on draft day.
After all, Brian Ching dipped into the PDL pool, and he didn't turn out too bad did he? What might be the SuperDraft's further loss could become a major gain for Premier Development League teams should MLS clubs invest more there for the next wave of players. That is, unless the league opts to etch the name of Brent Richards into how the administration of player movement is conducted in the future following recent events.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Me likey very much
First off, great piece and great topic.
This has been a quiet trend that is now beginning to come to the fore for MLS; in a sense, its a good problem to have. Effectively, professional teams are beginning to tussle and position themselves for young, promising talent. Think back, say, 5-7 years ago and this wasn’t the case, as the league in general was far more dependent on the draft and on overseas talent.
It speaks to the growth of MLS and football in the US, in particular, and I’m happy with these developments. Yes, its probably not the headache Garber wants to deal with right now but its something that MLS needs to begin defining much more rather than sticking to a case-by-case policy because as you note, other clubs are watching and this will not become an isolated incident. The days of being dependent on the draft as a pipeline for cheap, young quality talent are dwindling, and I wonder what impact this is going to have on the NCAA ranks in the next several years.
On that note, and particularly on the eve of the Draft, I’m really liking what the Dynamo have been doing the past several years in terms of growing the Academy and really looking at talent from the area. I had this discussion a while back with Martek and playtherapy in regards to the HUGE pool of talent just here in the Houston area and that as well as we’ve done in terms of finding that young talent, there’s still so much that is overlooked. But that’s also due to the way the USSF and the leagues (as well as schools and local clubs) are organized into overlapping fiefdoms…and honestly, that’s something that needs to at least be addressed (most likely not sorted out, but at least begin to tackle) in the next 5 years because it will become a bottleneck to finding and growing young talent. Let’s face it, our country is growing more diverse demographically and a happy benefit of that plus teh intertubez is that the influence of football from around the world is manifesting in the younger generation of players and how they play. If we, the Dynamo, can continue to expand that pool of talent then our future looks bright for years to come.
Excellent and Timely article
The recent Homegrown Player decisions have completely baffled me. Even after reading various articles regarding the rule, it seems that MLS is acting arbitrarily. LA’s recent claim on Villarreal is just as spurious as Portland’s, if not more so. Combined with MLS’s stated position that they are more interested in players developing their own young talent rather than acquiring it in the Superdraft makes me think that your hypothesis is exactly what they want. Essentially, MLS is green lighting clubs to invest in PDL type teams in order to get the best talent and diminish the importance of the Superdraft. I think that’s probably a good thing for soccer in this country and particularly clubs with active development programs in talent rich areas. I just hope that MLS makes the rule clearer so that if and when teams do invest in this manner, they won’t be undercut by teams making claims on players who worked with an assistant coach on a rec league team and therefore are a homegrown player.
One and Done Situation
I think you are making a lot out of the Richards decision. I think it is a one in done case that was only allowed because it was in the agreement for the Timbers to join the league. Merrit Paulson indicated yes Richards playing for the PDL club helped because it extended his relationship with Portland but he also hinted at the fact he has financially provided for the youth team he played on while Paulson owned the Timbers when they were in USL/NASL. The Union tried to use this same claim on Corey Hertzog and Zarek Valentin last year and again on Andrew Wenger this year. All three played for the PDL team Reading who the Union are associated with and all three played on club teams that the Union are now associated with but unlike the Timbers the Union did not provide any financial assistance to these club teams pre-their MLS existence and MLS was very clear in denying their claims.
I also think including Speas at the end of the article suggests multiple occurrences of this PDL connection and is misleading.
Right but
the idea, I think, is that this is suggestive of a trend and I don’t think you can deny it. To me its something that will shape the league for the next 5-10 years, and I certainly don’t think its in the best interests of MLS to hinder that. Also, Garber is going to have to take a look at this in issuing more clear guidelines because this arbitrary, case-by-case approach worked in the past but as teams expand their sphere of influence in terms of getting talent, the trickle will become a deluge. I know for Philly there is loads of talent around the area that I know the Union would love to get their hands on and develop; we’re no different. And that’s why its critical for MLS to come to terms with it in terms of this becoming league and team policy for years to come and shaping the way that GMs and coaches look for talent in building teams
Thanks for reading & responding jmcurto
Truly, the only reason for including the Speas transaction was that it transpired while I was putting this together & seemed to me another indication as to what I had started—that clubs might push these two routes to capture the rights over young players ever more so, removing them from the draft system and that this is the coming trend. The Richards deal might be a one & done but it might well be challenged by other clubs which might see it as a precedent set.
Also, while Philly might have had their claims denied over the lack of financial assistance then, what I was alluding to was clubs might consider taking the initiative in developing those financial ties now & into the future in the wake of this ruling so that subsequent claims of a similar vein cannot be denied by the league.
by Jason LeBlanc on Jan 11, 2012 2:27 PM CST up reply actions
Jason
You sir are one hell of a writer. Kudos on this article. Well written, well-informed, and well said.
-- "...I was sick, napping, and then woke up and came to the computer to read a note from the Gingered Angel of Doom..." Martek - Dynamo Theory Blog
This is what we've been saying all along
Dynamo’s growing influence in the Valley and their interest with the Austin Aztex yields benefits that are not always obvious to the outside observer. I only hope that they continue this trend by affiliating with the San Antonio Scorpions as soon as possible. This accomplishes many things, but two in particular are:
1. It puts Dynamo in line for Home Grown Player claims ala Jason’s excellent piece above.
2. But furthermore, it creates in the minds of observers of those teams that when they watch the Scorps or the AzTex, they are watching the mini-Dynamo. By being a consistent winner and forming professional, official contacts with those two clubs, Dynamo in essence stake a claim as being Texas’ team all off Central and South Texas. Young players growing up in those markets who see the Scorps and the AzTex, who connect with the Dynamo Academy teams in Austin and the Rio Grande Valley, see Dynamo as their MLS destination.
Why is this important? Well, first, if we don;t move into those markets aggressively then we cede those areas to someone who will, namely FC Dallas. Right now, that organization can’t even get a naming sponsor for their stadium, but at some point, they might just get their organization act together, and when or if that happens, then they will wake up to a very Orange Texas.

"We don't care who finishes second." -- Celtic's Peter Lowrie
Aren't they the ONLY Texas team?
The other one claims Texas ties, but we all know Dallas is really just Southern Oklahoma!
-- "...I was sick, napping, and then woke up and came to the computer to read a note from the Gingered Angel of Doom..." Martek - Dynamo Theory Blog
Not so fast
Portland negotiated homegrown status for their pdl affiliate players as part of their expansion agreement with MLS. Therefore, the Richards decision is not a precedent for any other club.
But Don...
I think the Richards case is still worth study here. While the specifics of it are indeed a one-off, it can provide something of a path forward in terms of a reason or two why Dynamo would want to build relationships with developmental/lower division sides in Texas. Granted, those reasons were just as valid before the Richards decision as after, but it does provide a prima facie example of something quite good happening as a result of such an association/relationship.
Ultimately, one quite good thing that could come out of this is to have a player from the Greater Frisco area play for one of these teams, have Dynamo recognize him first and then file a hometown claim on the guy. Whether he plays a minute or not, this hypothetical player would be forever lionized down here. :>
"We don't care who finishes second." -- Celtic's Peter Lowrie
You said
what I had been wanting to say but couldn’t find the right words. You’re a pretty good writer, huh? ;-)
PS – If we can surround all of Texas except the Frisco area as our “homegrown” territory I will be most pleased…most pleased, indeed
Orlando City
Orlando City didn’t just purchase a PDL team, they’ve also acquired an entire youth club .The move to a European youth development structure will create a football pyramid unique in Florida, offering a path for talented young players all the way to the pro team. It’s not just about positioning themselves as the front runner for the next MLS expansion, it’s about laying correct foundations for a football club. Given the disgraceful state of youth soccer in this country, theses sort of moves by professional clubs can only be a good thing.

by 












