MLS 101: Roster Rules and the Salary Cap
The MLS 101 series will be a "living/breathing document" in that I will continue to edit and update these post to keep up to date with the inevitable changes that MLS will make. I encourage you to bookmark the post so you can use them as a reference going forward.
Time to put on your thinking caps, or tinfoil hat if you prefer, and dive into an examination of Major League Soccer's current roster and salary cap rules, and how they apply to the 2012 Dynamo. A few notes before we get started:
- This is based on the last MLSPA Salary information release from 9/1/11
- There is some speculation on my part concerning salary levels for new players.
- I was told there would be no math...they lied.
The Dynamo at this very moment, have 19 players on their active roster. Add to that seven new players that have been drafted over the past week and that brings the roster to 26. The latest MLS roster rules explain that a team can have up to 30 players on their roster, within a somewhat complex set of guidelines (which I'll get to in a minute).
The salary cap for each MLS team in 2011 was $2.675 million. When the new collective bargaining agreement was agreed to in 2010, the salary cap jumped just over 10% from it's previous point. As part of the deal, the cap will increase 5% each season until the deal expires in 2014. In addition, minimum salaries ($42k in 2011) will increase 5% per season as well. This means the 2012 salary cap should be $2,808,750 with minimum salaries set at $44,100.
It's a somewhat loose cap with various ways to work around. That's how the Galaxy and the Red Bulls are able to spend upwards of $15 million on salary, while the Dynamo spend significantly less.
It's not that Houston or other clubs couldn't spend that much, they just chose not to or cannot afford the additional cost. That's the wiggle designed in to the salary cap system in MLS that actually allows for some kind of "free spending" should a team's ownership be willing to foot the bill (while still preventing runaway spending) by utilizing designated players slots and allocation money (see Lesson Two).
The Dynamo run a tight ship and it's been effective for them. The new stadium will help increase revenues for the club, along with the improved shirt sponsorship deal they signed last season. Until AEG unloads their majority share in the club though, I doubt you're going to see the Dynamo spending big money anytime soon, and that's just fine.
Spending doesn't equal trophies and it's not like Houston is financially handicapped, just restrained. If anything it forces Kinnear and Canetti to work smarter and be shrewder with personnel decisions, something they've shown to be very good at.
Alright, on to the finer details.
Here are the 2011 MLS Roster rules. There are likely to be some changes but this will at least give you an idea of the system the Dynamo have to work in.
- Players occupying roster spots 1-20 count against the club's 2011 salary budget of $2,675,000, and are referred to collectively as the club's Salary Budget Players.
- Roster spots 19 and 20 are not required to be filled, and teams may spread their salary budget across only 18 Salary Budget Players. A minimum salary budget charge will be imputed against a team's salary budget for each unfilled senior roster slot below 18.
- The maximum budget charge for a single player is $335,000.
- A Designated Player counts $335,000 against the club's salary budget, unless the player joins his club in the middle of the season, in which case his budget charge will be $167,500.
- Players occupying roster spots 21-30 do not count against the club's salary budget, and are referred to collectively as the club's Off-Budget Players (maximum of 10 per team).
- All Generation adidas players are Off-Budget players.
- Players occupying roster spots 1-24 will earn at least $42,000 in 2011.
- Players occupying roster spots 25-30 will earn at least $32,600 in 2011.
- Clubs may elect to leave up to two of these roster spots (25-30) vacant and use $35,000 for each empty spot as allocation money.
- Clubs may sign up to two Home Grown Players to Generation adidas contracts.
- Age Designations: Any player making $32,600 must be under the age 25 (does not turn 25 or older in 2011).
- As of 2011, each MLS team began with eight international slots, which are tradable. There is no limit on the number of international slots on each club's roster. Remaining roster slots must belong to domestic players. For clubs based in the United States, a domestic player is either a U.S. citizen, a permanent resident (green card holder) or the holder of other special status (e.g., refugee or asylum status). MLS clubs based in Canada began with eight international slots as well, but their domestic slots may be filled with either Canadian or U.S. domestic players.
- MLS clubs based in Canada are required to have a minimum of three Canadian domestic players on their rosters. Players with the legal right to work in Canada are considered Canadian domestic players (i.e., Canadian citizen, permanent resident, part of a protected class).
Roster sports 1-20 (On-Budget):
1. Corey Ashe, 2. Bobby Boswell, 3. Luiz Camargo, 4. Geoff Cameron, 5. Calen Carr, 6. Colin Clark, 7. Brad Davis, 8. Andre Hainault, 9. Tally Hall, 10. Adam Moffat, 11. Nathan Sturgis, 12. Jermaine Taylor, 13. Je-Vaughn Watson, 14. Cam Weaver, 15. Tyler Deric, 16-20. Open.
24 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Magnum opus
Great, great stuff Fire-Headed Leader. Wow, I don’t want to know what dark arts you had to conjure up to write this up but this gives a much better idea of what we’re facing going into the 2012-13 season. Mind you, its still not clear as MLS loves their opacity concerning, well, ALOT of stuff but it at least helps give a lay of the land.
That aside, these contract negotiations that we currently have on the plate have some interesting knock-on implications: if we can’t get a good deal with Cruz and we lose him is that free or did it not “exist” since he was on a GA contract? It also seems that we’re out looking for either a DP (low-end DP) or two sub-DP players…I could definitely see that happening, perhaps a guy from Panama or the like. Also, this really highlights what a great job Dom & Canetti have done of doing the best they can with what they’re given: we aren’t given crazy LA/NY money to spend but we’re able to put together some really quality rosters that compete. I think it just goes to show what a Coach & GM we have on our hands.
We’ll see how it all plays out going in to pre-season camp, I’m anxious to see how our roster looks before we officially kick off again
Cruz
Cruz’s contract option was declined so if I understand the service time rules right, he can renegotiate with the Dynamo or if he can find a deal with a new team, he’ll need the Dyanmo to trade his rights in order to make the move within the league. He’s free to pursue deals outside of MLS though and it would be a free transfer.
--
Managing Editor of Dynamo Theory
by Zach Woosley on Jan 18, 2012 2:28 PM CST up reply actions
The Dynamo retain the right of first refusal on Danny Cruz indefinitely only if attempts were made to re-sign the player (which they have been). If Cruz transfers overseas, and the Dynamo receives allocation money as a result of a player’s transfer, the team does not retain a right of first refusal if the player returns to MLS.
--
Managing Editor of Dynamo Theory
by Zach Woosley on Jan 18, 2012 7:55 PM CST up reply actions
Vertigo
I’m amazed that you can make any sense whatsoever of the MLS salary restrictions. I tried explaining this to a non-MLS friend and basically gave up and said no one knows (which is not far off). It’s a credit to the players, coaches and organization that we made it to the MLS cup last year. That said, the current line up makes me queasy. I pray to whatever orange colored god cares about soccer that our opening day roster doesn’t look like it does now. Not that we don’t have great guys with lots of potential and ability and heart and etc. But how many teams do you think the Dynamo would rate above on the FIFA 12 scale with a line up of:
Carr-Bruin
Davis-Camargo-Moffat-Clark
Ashe-Cameron-Boswell-Hainault
RM
is starting to worry me more and more, considering that if Cruz isn’t coming back then we have Clark, Watson and Dixon available there. Now, I think my preference for that position is clear but to be honest, I wouldn’t want to see Dixon mixed in as a starter (no pun intended, though I do pat myself on the back for that) until at least 10 games in. That means it would be left to Clark, which wouldn’t have concerned me last year but after what happened towards the end of the season I haven’t the foggiest clue how he’s holding up or what state he’s in. And Watson, well, form your own opinion.
Bruin-Carr won’t necessarily make people tremble, though of course we know the Bear is capable of getting hot and going on a tear…its the Carr part that concerns me more. Actually, two spots I hadn’t been too concerned with (FW/RM) are starting to creep up now. I still say we need a proper CAM first, and then find quality signings at either spot, but if Cruz signs elsewhere I may have to change that line of reasoning
WE MADE IT
that extra 200K will be 2 players for us…Antigua here we come!!
/sad trombone
Real talk: we could use all the space we can get. With 3 competitions this year we need more bodies, even if they do seem underwhelming on paper…I have faith in our coaching staff to get the most out of them (minus a Jamaican fella and another I can’t mention or one of our dear writers will suffer liver failure)
Roster spots 29 and 30
I would think the Dynamo would want to keep the roster spots 29 & 30 unused so the can get 70k extra allocation money
which means that Houston can add three more cheap (under the age of 25) players in the roster spots 26, 27, & 28
so with that logic, only 3 of the 5 supplemental draft picks would be able to make the team, unless Houston puts some of them on the budgeted list but that would mean they would have pay them more money…
or they could do what dynamo theory has suggested and move either Deric or Dixon up to the on budget list which would free up one more super cheap roster spots for a fourth supplemental draft guy
New Info
Learned last night that Deric was already on the On-Budget List last season, though he could theoretically be moved around if needed.
--
Managing Editor of Dynamo Theory
by Zach Woosley on Jan 19, 2012 8:24 AM CST up reply actions
rumors
was just reading the “post card from europe” on mlssoccer, and it seems to suggest marcus tracy will be on his way to mls. I don’t remember, how long do we hold the rights for him is it two or three years? That could potentially be a good pick up
by Futbol anonymous on Jan 18, 2012 10:13 PM CST reply actions
Marcus Tracy
If the Dynamo didn’t receive allocation money, which I doubt they did since he was a draft pick, the should still hold his rights should Tracy return. At the very least, first right of refusal.
--
Managing Editor of Dynamo Theory
by Zach Woosley on Jan 19, 2012 8:23 AM CST up reply actions
International Slots?
Does anyone know who is occupies the Dynamo’s international slots and how many are available?
Camargo, Hainault, Taylor and Watson are currently using international slots. Moffat is considered domestic thanks to marriage apparently, so that would leave two international slots (I think). The Dynamo have traded one or two so I’m not sure on the exact number, but Costly was using one so we know there’s at least one free one available.
--
Managing Editor of Dynamo Theory
by Zach Woosley on Jan 19, 2012 8:17 AM CST up reply actions
UPDATES
Got some information last night, I’ve udpated the post with some of it, but I’m putting it all here as well.
1. Tyler Deric was on the senior roster last season and part of the On-Budget List.
2. Chris Rolfe is the only Dynamo draft pick who signed a contract with MLS already, so he’d likely go right to the Off-Budget List.
3. Youth DP Rule: Should the Dynamo sign a younger DP player, their salary is adjusted to hit the cap less as part of MLS’ plan to encourage teams to invest in younger talent.
4. The rest of the draft picks do not have contracts and will have to earn a spot in pre-season. I wouldn’t expect more than one or two to make the cut, but you never know.
5. With the reduction in CCL matches, the Dynamo will likely carry less than 30 players on the roster, something they did last season.
6. The Dynamo will still likely add a third GK. Tim Hanley is always scouting college keepers so they may already have a couple in mind. Kinnear likes to have a third keeper on the roster.
--
Managing Editor of Dynamo Theory
Update 2 above: Chris or Colin...Rolfe?
Presumably Colin Rolfe? Since Chris is somewhere in Germany or the Nordic wonderlands, if I recall…
Colin, apologies for the typo.
--
Managing Editor of Dynamo Theory
by Zach Woosley on Jan 19, 2012 10:36 AM CST up reply actions
Rolfe Rolfe
This Colin v Chris thing is going to happen somewhere around 150 times (I’m picking the over.) before the season starts. Let’s just make this easy and call the guy what he is.
Meat.
"We don't care who finishes second." -- Celtic's Peter Lowrie
by Martek on Jan 19, 2012 12:00 PM CST via iPhone app up reply actions
Wow
this will definitely be an interesting off-season, though hopefully if we off-load Watson it frees up some change but more importantly, the INTL spot he takes up.
I’d love for us to sign a younger DP, as it should be looked at as an investment (and the fact that it has less of a cap hit is all the more reason) but of course those are matters for the Eye of AEG.
I also hope a couple of draft signings (Rolfe aside) make the cut, as they seem eager to contribute…but of course, money & talent trump all things, so you’re right that probably 1-2 kids make the roster. I do hope we’re trolling NASL teams as there are potential gems there as well that can be had on the cheap, if we’re looking to use the INTL spots wisely and of course keep the expenses under control.
We still have a solid roster, but to really separate from the pack we need at least one impact signing and another solid player, both in the middle-to-last-third of the pitch.
My somewhat realistic dream...
is to sign Kris Boyd and Oscar Boniek Garcia, and possibly an extra depth defender. Those two players makes us a true competitor for the title.
Nice
that would be a darn successful off-season in my book. True, we still would be lacking a “pure” CAM but as we saw last season, Camargo did a good a job as any impersonating one. Maybe given more time on the ball he’ll ease more into it and then its not an issue anymore. But in any event, we’d get a proven goalscorer and a significant bump in quality on the right, and if we can sign Ibeagha to a deal we can start bleeding him as a reserve defender. As you note, this isn’t some far-fetched dream, this could realistically happen…we’ll see how the next few weeks go, I’ve got my fingers crossed














