Thou Shalt Not Letter: USSF Bans High School Soccer for Academy Players
Heres the crux of it: if you want to play Academy-level soccer, don't plan on lettering for your high school team anytime soon. Last week,the US Developmental Academy announced a shift to a 10-month schedule, complete with a ban on any high school play by its members.
*shrugs*
Its not all that surprising, really. The general sentiment has been talked about for years. High school is a lower level of play, where players risk getting injured or worn out. But is it that simple?
I thought back to four years ago, when I was playing high school soccer in Houston. Honestly, I couldn't imagine quitting my high school team. My brother was a star when he played, holding plenty of school records, and all of my friends were on the team. We started the season ranked #1 in the nation, and were stacked with a group of players infinitely better than I was.
And thats the problem: high school soccer was great for me because I got to play at a much higher level than what I could have otherwise. More than that, I could still succeed when I got onto the pitch, since the level of competition was fairly low once we took on other teams in our district.
My own experiences in high school don't mimic what is being asked of these Academy players. So I contacted my old teammate and best friend (stifle your "awwww's" people...) Cale Haas.
Cale played for the club formerly known as Texas Heat, was a teammate of mine in high school, and just finished out his college career. Between talk of senior year antics and revelry, he graced me with some insight on the matter. Hit the jump to see what he had to say (on the subject at hand, not the aforementioned antics and revelry). If either of our mothers are reading, I am of course referring to studying. Lots of studying. With books...and computers...or something...
I asked Cale what he though of the new USSF changes. While neither of us were a part of the Academy structure in club play, as it was implemented a year after our graduation, he was certainly a part of a team playing at an Academy level. Heres some hits from his response, with my score of Pro or Con from the perspective of the Academy players' development:
"High school soccer is a way for great players to maintain levels of fitness, keep their skills with the ball refined, and maintain confidence in a pressure-free environment"
My best comparison for this is like playing pre-season friendlies all season long. For the best players, against sub-par competition, high school games allow them to focus on the finer points of the game. In practice, where coaches don't have much time to implement a team identity through complex formations, the focus usually switches to fitness.
There is, however, a danger in playing down to the level of your opponents. Complacency can set in, and while teams can pass the ball around all day, you lose the necessity to create in a pressure situation. That, of course, is assuming you are on a successful squad. If you are the lone talent on your high school team, you may end up running around for 80 minutes a match trying to save your faltering team. That does little to foster development.
Result: Pro for fitness, Con for development.
"It also helps players build a sense of loyalty to their school and community...huge for any player pursuing a collegiate career"
This is a big one for me, and something that I think a lot of Academy players will miss. Since recruiting for football is done exclusively through high school play, the football team holds the hopes of an entire school - and sometimes an entire town - on its shoulders. This results in a type of culture and tradition espoused in shows like Friday Night Lights. High school soccer is similar, but less supported. Still, wearing your letterman jacket to school brings up a type of pride and status not reached by club play. While Dynamo Academy members might represent the future of the franchise, it is still represented in an iffy kind of way. They are supported insofar as they succeed at the senior level. This brings clout down the line, but I doubt that you'll find communities rallying around their Academy players anytime soon.
Result: Con
"If they had forbid high school soccer when I was playing I wouldn't have played...exposure and competition come from the club level"
College scouts recruit out Academy teams, while high school is more for show than anything else. The only top-level competition will come in the postseason, assuming you're on a successful team. Even then, I doubt you'll see many ACC and Big East coaches traveling to Texas to watch a high school state semi-final, but I could be wrong. Regardless, it isn't comparable to any Academy tournament, where scouts come out in droves and top-level talent is on display. Players will gain little exposure through their high school squad.
Result: Pro
"club and academy must have a year-round season and tournaments...practice many times a week"
This has been addressed by USSF, and is the main point of the new Academy structure. With the extended schedule (10 months, instead of 7), the emphasis will be put on player development. Practices will become the most important asset to players, instead of being overloaded with games. In the old system, players spent just as much time (if not more) playing in competitive matches as they did practicing with their teammates. This addresses a common complaint against the old system, and represents the direction Klinssman is hoping to take the USSF.
Result: Pro
So, overall I think this is a step in the right direction. The USSF is still a long way off from creating a coherent, thoroughly accepted structure. That will take time. This does begin to instill the culture of the Academy system as a means to develop top talent.
We are just now seeing the benefits of the Dynamo Academy's humble beginnings. Guys like Dixon and Soto are already making big strides with the Senior team, and this will only continue. Down the line, the policy change removes the mental and physical distraction of high school soccer from the equation. Now, the training staff can work, starting at the youngest levels, on bringing up players with a direct message. In 5 to 10 years time, this message will hopefully become part of the Dynamo culture/legacy/dynasty (?), etc.
For now, the Academy players will have to grin and bear the lack of clout they carry around campus. They may miss the letterman jackets, but a few years down the road they can hopefully don a Dynamo kit.
Could we get them Dynamo letterman jackets in the meantime?
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice
however, my main bone of contention is that with the majority of “bigger” clubs (read: those with more exposure) is the pay-to-play system. Just as now, there is more talent out there playing in smaller, local clubs that don’t get the exposure; for some, the only other avenue is high school play. Effectively since the USSF is ignoring that, I dearly hope the next major step is creating a more effective structure to include local clubs that aren’t “on the radar”. In my neck of the woods, there are robust ethnic leagues with clubs loaded with talent, but they aren’t Premier teams like Eclipse, and so therefore I don’t believe they’re scouted.
I understand the decision and in fairness, its a smart one, but one that will require a greater structure and organization to ensure that you aren’t creating talent bottlenecks. Let’s hope USSF can see it through
Can't complete reading this piece right this second
I got to the part about you playing in high school ONLY FOUR YEARS AGO and then could read no further.
Old. I am old. Ollllddddddd.
"We don't care who finishes second." -- Celtic's Peter Lowrie
Bad Call
What happened to Klinnsman’s desire to move away from the pay for play system? This seems like a really good way to crush a bunch of outlets for players that are still developing. Boo US Soccer, boo.
I understand why they are doing this
The fact is this really only affects a small % of kids though. The 10 month schedule ensuring they are training at a high level is more important than getting them off a high school team for a few months.
I think expanding the scouting where talented kids who aren’t part of some prestigious club team can get noticed is more important than keeping the developmental academy kids off of high school teams. There’s plenty of kids who slip through the cracks, are just late bloomers, or whose parents couldn’t make the sacrifices necessary for their child to be a part of the club scene. That’s where high school(and colleges) will still play an important role. I hope the USSF doesn’t completely ignore kids from the high school ranks. That’s the first and only chance for some kids to play in an organized setting. With so many high schools I know it would be hard for the USSF to implement anything meaningful, but they outght to at least be looking at ways to improve the high school system. Relying solely on the pay to play system is always going to limit your talent pool.
"If my hips had pockets, I wouldn't wear pants at all." @NotBurtReynolds
Some thoughts
This is an interesting perspective. In general, I am very much in favor of the change to a 10-month schedule. But it does exert certain stress on families and the players’ social lives. The Dev Acads are certainly going to have to address these issues going forward.
"We don't care who finishes second." -- Celtic's Peter Lowrie
by Martek on Feb 16, 2012 4:54 PM CST via iPhone app reply actions
Bad Move
The old tug of war between club and HS has reached a new level. The kid should be first not who they play for. Why not increase the roster size so if somebody gets hurt the team is not hurt.
Maybe this isn’t the case in a diverse city such as Houston, but around the country I bet there are high school soccer coaches that don’t know squat about soccer. “Hey go out there and kill ’em boys,” they might say. So you get a developmental player on a team led by one of these meat heads and he learns poor techniques and runs a high chance of getting injured.
Playing on clubs as a youth you can tell which teams have coaches that know what they’re talking about and which ones have guys that are better suited for American football leading them. The only way the USSF can ensure that players don’t pick up bad habits/injuries playing for these nimrods is to disallow it.
I doubt that this means they won’t pay attention to a standout high school player that isn’t in the club system due to family/financial constraints. The restrictions will only apply to the players already in the academy pool.
The elite players do not show up
The problems with the so called elite players is that they disappear. Very few climb up all the way. Less than 1% get there and 99 to 98 % never receive any advance training.

by 












